Ryzen 3 5300G vs EPYC 7282

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7282
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
19.55
+136%
Ryzen 3 5300G
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
8.28

EPYC 7282 outperforms Ryzen 3 5300G by a whopping 136% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7282 and Ryzen 3 5300G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking298923
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.81no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency15.1311.83
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Cezanne (2021−2024)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$650no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7282 and Ryzen 3 5300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads328
Base clock speed2.8 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplier2840
L1 cache1 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7282 and Ryzen 3 5300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7282 and Ryzen 3 5300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7282 and Ryzen 3 5300G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7282 and Ryzen 3 5300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7282 and Ryzen 3 5300G.

PCIe versionno data4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7282 19.55
+136%
Ryzen 3 5300G 8.28

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7282 30474
+136%
Ryzen 3 5300G 12902

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7282 1096
Ryzen 3 5300G 1762
+60.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7282 8073
+48.3%
Ryzen 3 5300G 5442

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.55 8.28
Recency 7 August 2019 13 April 2021
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 32 8
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 7282 has a 136.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Ryzen 3 5300G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 84.6% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7282 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 5300G in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7282 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 5300G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7282 and Ryzen 3 5300G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7282
EPYC 7282
AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
Ryzen 3 5300G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 45 votes

Rate EPYC 7282 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 105 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 5300G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7282 or Ryzen 3 5300G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.