Processor U300 vs EPYC 7282

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7282 and Processor U300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking299not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.77no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Raptor Lake-U
Power efficiency15.13no data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Raptor Lake-U (2023)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$650$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7282 and Processor U300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)5 (Penta-Core)
Threads326
Base clock speed2.8 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rateno data55 MHz
Multiplier28no data
L1 cache1 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7282 and Processor U300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4Intel BGA 1744
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7282 and Processor U300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 7282 and Processor U300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7282 and Processor U300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7282 and Processor U300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7282 and Processor U300.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2019 4 January 2023
Physical cores 16 5
Threads 32 6
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 15 Watt

EPYC 7282 has 220% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Processor U300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 700% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7282 and Processor U300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7282 is a server/workstation processor while Processor U300 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7282 and Processor U300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7282
EPYC 7282
Intel Processor U300
Processor U300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 45 votes

Rate EPYC 7282 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 12 votes

Rate Processor U300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7282 or Processor U300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.