EPYC 8024P vs EPYC 7282

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7282
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
19.18
+48.2%
EPYC 8024P
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
12.94

EPYC 7282 outperforms EPYC 8024P by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7282 and EPYC 8024P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking298583
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.7320.47
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency15.1313.61
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Siena (2023−2024)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)18 September 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$650$409

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 8024P has 39% better value for money than EPYC 7282.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7282 and EPYC 8024P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier28no data
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm5 nm
Die size192 mm273 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million8,875 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7282 and EPYC 8024P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4SP6
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt90 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7282 and EPYC 8024P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7282 and EPYC 8024P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7282 and EPYC 8024P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7282 and EPYC 8024P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data96

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7282 19.18
+48.2%
EPYC 8024P 12.94

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7282 30474
+48.2%
EPYC 8024P 20556

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.18 12.94
Recency 7 August 2019 18 September 2023
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 90 Watt

EPYC 7282 has a 48.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

EPYC 8024P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7282 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 8024P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7282 and EPYC 8024P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7282
EPYC 7282
AMD EPYC 8024P
EPYC 8024P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 45 votes

Rate EPYC 7282 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8024P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7282 or EPYC 8024P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.