i5-1038G7 vs EPYC 7282
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 450 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 11.81 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | Intel Ice Lake |
| Power efficiency | 6.09 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2019−2020) | Ice Lake U (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 7 August 2019 (6 years ago) | 4 May 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $650 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7282 and Core i5-1038G7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Multiplier | 28 | no data |
| L1 cache | 1 MB | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | 6 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 2x 74 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 7,600 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7282 and Core i5-1038G7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | SP3 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7282 and Core i5-1038G7. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7282 and Core i5-1038G7 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7282 and Core i5-1038G7. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7282 and Core i5-1038G7.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 August 2019 | 4 May 2020 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 4 |
| Threads | 32 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 28 Watt |
EPYC 7282 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
i5-1038G7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 328.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7282 and Intel Core i5-1038G7. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7282 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-1038G7 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
