5 205H vs EPYC 7282

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking495not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.25no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Raptor Lake-H
Power efficiency6.11no data
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Raptor Lake-H Refresh (2026)
Release date7 August 2019 (7 years ago)7 June 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$650no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of EPYC 7282 and Core 5 205H: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3212
Base clock speed2.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier28no data
L1 cache1 MB704 KB
L2 cache8 MB8 MB
L3 cache64 MB12 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size2x 74 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors7,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7282 and Core 5 205H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketSP3BGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7282 and Core 5 205H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7282 and Core 5 205H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7282 and Core 5 205H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7282 and Core 5 205H.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2019 7 June 2026
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm

EPYC 7282 has 100% more physical cores and 167% more threads, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

5 205H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years.

We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7282 and Intel Core 5 205H. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7282 is a server/workstation processor while Core 5 205H is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 53 votes

Rate EPYC 7282 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 5 205H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7282 and Core 5 205H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.