Ryzen 5 PRO 230 vs EPYC 7272

#ad 
Buy EPYC 7272
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7272
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
15.68
+20.7%
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
2025
6 cores / 12 threads, 28 Watt
12.99

EPYC 7272 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 230 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking477640
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.27no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Power efficiency12.5343.81
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$625no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7272 and Ryzen 5 PRO 230 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads2412
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.9 GHz
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache96 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)6 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm4 nm
Die size192 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors3,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7272 and Ryzen 5 PRO 230 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketSP3FP7/FP7r2/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7272 and Ryzen 5 PRO 230. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataRyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7272 and Ryzen 5 PRO 230 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7272 and Ryzen 5 PRO 230. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7272 and Ryzen 5 PRO 230.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7272 15.68
+20.7%
Ryzen 5 PRO 230 12.99

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7272 25161
+20.7%
Ryzen 5 PRO 230 20841

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.68 12.99
Recency 7 August 2019 6 January 2025
Physical cores 12 6
Threads 24 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 28 Watt

EPYC 7272 has a 20.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 230, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 328.6% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7272 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 230 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7272 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 230 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7272
EPYC 7272
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 230
Ryzen 5 PRO 230

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 21 votes

Rate EPYC 7272 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7272 and Ryzen 5 PRO 230, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.