Xeon 6325P vs EPYC 7262

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7262
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 155 Watt
12.92
+29.7%
Xeon 6325P
2025
4 cores / 8 threads, 55 Watt
9.96

EPYC 7262 outperforms Xeon 6325P by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking663881
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.1576.54
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency8.0417.47
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)24 February 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$575$281

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 6325P has 737% better value for money than EPYC 7262.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7262 and Xeon 6325P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5.2 GHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache96 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2163 mm2
Number of transistors3,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7262 and Xeon 6325P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketSP31700
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7262 and Xeon 6325P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 7262 and Xeon 6325P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7262 and Xeon 6325P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7262 and Xeon 6325P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7262 and Xeon 6325P.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7262 12.92
+29.7%
Xeon 6325P 9.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7262 20779
+29.8%
Xeon 6325P 16013

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.92 9.96
Recency 7 August 2019 24 February 2025
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 55 Watt

EPYC 7262 has a 29.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon 6325P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and 181.8% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7262 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon 6325P in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7262
EPYC 7262
Intel Xeon 6325P
Xeon 6325P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 21 votes

Rate EPYC 7262 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6325P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7262 and Xeon 6325P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.