Xeon Gold 6142F vs EPYC 7261
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7261 and Xeon Gold 6142F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 992 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Series | AMD EPYC | Intel Xeon Gold |
Power efficiency | 3.91 | no data |
Architecture codename | Naples (2017−2018) | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) |
Release date | 14 June 2018 (6 years ago) | 11 July 2017 (7 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $3,101 |
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7261 and Xeon Gold 6142F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
Threads | 16 | 32 |
Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Multiplier | 25 | 26 |
L1 cache | 768 KB | 1 MB |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 16 MB |
L3 cache | 64 MB | 22 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 87 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 81 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 19200 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7261 and Xeon Gold 6142F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 4 (Multiprocessor) |
Socket | SP3 | FCLGA3647 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 155 W, 170 Watt | 160 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7261 and Xeon Gold 6142F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Security technologies
EPYC 7261 and Xeon Gold 6142F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7261 and Xeon Gold 6142F are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7261 and Xeon Gold 6142F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 |
Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | 768 GB |
Max memory channels | 8 | 6 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 170.671 GB/s | 128.001 GB/s |
ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7261 and Xeon Gold 6142F.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 128 | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 14 June 2018 | 11 July 2017 |
Physical cores | 8 | 16 |
Threads | 16 | 32 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 160 Watt |
EPYC 7261 has an age advantage of 11 months, and 3.2% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6142F, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 7261 and Xeon Gold 6142F. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7261 and Xeon Gold 6142F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.