Ryzen 7 4800HS vs EPYC 7261
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 4800HS outperforms EPYC 7261 by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1257 | 903 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) |
| Power efficiency | 1.58 | 9.66 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Naples (2017−2018) | Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) |
| Release date | 14 June 2018 (7 years ago) | 6 January 2020 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7261 and Ryzen 7 4800HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Multiplier | 25 | 29 |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 156 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 81 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 9,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7261 and Ryzen 7 4800HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | SP3 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7261 and Ryzen 7 4800HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7261 and Ryzen 7 4800HS are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7261 and Ryzen 7 4800HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 8 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 170.671 GB/s | 68.27 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1600 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7261 and Ryzen 7 4800HS.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.36 | 10.29 |
| Recency | 14 June 2018 | 6 January 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 45 Watt |
Ryzen 7 4800HS has a 61.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 277.8% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD EPYC 7261 in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 7261 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 4800HS is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
