i3-N305 vs EPYC 7252

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7252
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 120 Watt
12.22
+94.9%
Core i3-N305
2023
8 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
6.27

EPYC 7252 outperforms Core i3-N305 by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7252 and Core i3-N305 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6251063
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.61no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency9.6439.56
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$475$309

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7252 and Core i3-N305 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2.8 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplier31no data
L1 cache96K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per module)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7252 and Core i3-N305 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4FCBGA1264
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7252 and Core i3-N305. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Thermal Monitoring-+
GPIOno data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 7252 and Core i3-N305 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7252 and Core i3-N305 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7252 and Core i3-N305. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiB16 GB
Max memory channels81
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.25 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7252 and Core i3-N305 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 7252 and Core i3-N305 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 7252 and Core i3-N305 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7252 and Core i3-N305.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7252 12.22
+94.9%
i3-N305 6.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7252 19411
+95%
i3-N305 9953

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.22 6.27
Recency 7 August 2019 3 January 2023
Threads 16 8
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 15 Watt

EPYC 7252 has a 94.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

i3-N305, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 700% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7252 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-N305 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7252 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-N305 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7252 and Core i3-N305, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7252
EPYC 7252
Intel Core i3-N305
Core i3-N305

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 28 votes

Rate EPYC 7252 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 621 vote

Rate Core i3-N305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7252 or Core i3-N305, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.