Xeon 6369P vs EPYC 7251
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7251 and Xeon 6369P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 854 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.50 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 7.39 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Naples (2017−2018) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 29 June 2017 (7 years ago) | 24 February 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $574 | $606 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7251 and Xeon 6369P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 5.7 GHz |
| Multiplier | 21 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | 257 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7251 and Xeon 6369P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | TR4 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7251 and Xeon 6369P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
EPYC 7251 and Xeon 6369P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7251 and Xeon 6369P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7251 and Xeon 6369P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 153.652 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7251 and Xeon 6369P.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 June 2017 | 24 February 2025 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 95 Watt |
Xeon 6369P has an age advantage of 7 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 26.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7251 and Intel Xeon 6369P. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
