Ultra 7 265 vs EPYC 7251

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7251 and Core Ultra 7 265 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking796not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.14no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency7.42no data
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)January 2025
Launch price (MSRP)$574no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7251 and Core Ultra 7 265 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads1620
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz5.3 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache96K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)33 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7251 and Core Ultra 7 265 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR41851
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7251 and Core Ultra 7 265. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7251 and Core Ultra 7 265 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7251 and Core Ultra 7 265 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7251 and Core Ultra 7 265. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth153.652 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7251 and Core Ultra 7 265.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 8 20
Threads 16 20
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 65 Watt

Ultra 7 265 has 150% more physical cores and 25% more threads, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 84.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7251 and Core Ultra 7 265. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7251 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7251 and Core Ultra 7 265, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7251
EPYC 7251
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
Core Ultra 7 265

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 121 vote

Rate EPYC 7251 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7251 or Core Ultra 7 265, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.