Xeon 6369P vs EPYC 7203P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7203P
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 120 Watt
12.48
Xeon 6369P
2025
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
16.82
+34.8%

Xeon 6369P outperforms EPYC 7203P by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking642405
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation29.0024.30
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency4.417.51
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Release date5 September 2023 (1 year ago)24 February 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$348$606

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7203P has 19% better value for money than Xeon 6369P.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7203P and Xeon 6369P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Threads1616
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size2x 81 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors8,300 millionno data
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7203P and Xeon 6369P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7203P and Xeon 6369P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 7203P and Xeon 6369P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7203P and Xeon 6369P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7203P and Xeon 6369P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7203P and Xeon 6369P.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7203P 12.48
Xeon 6369P 16.82
+34.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7203P 22017
Xeon 6369P 29680
+34.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.48 16.82
Recency 5 September 2023 24 February 2025
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon 6369P has a 34.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 26.3% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon 6369P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD EPYC 7203P in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7203P
EPYC 7203P
Intel Xeon 6369P
Xeon 6369P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 7203P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6369P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7203P and Xeon 6369P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.