i7-14700F vs EPYC 7203
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7203 and Core i7-14700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 182 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 65.21 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | no data | 39.25 |
| Architecture codename | Milan (2021−2023) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 5 September 2023 (1 year ago) | 8 January 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $338 | $359 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7203 and Core i7-14700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 28 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 33 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 2x 81 mm2 | 257 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 8,300 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7203 and Core i7-14700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | SP3 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7203 and Core i7-14700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 7203 and Core i7-14700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7203 and Core i7-14700F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7203 and Core i7-14700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7203 and Core i7-14700F.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 September 2023 | 8 January 2024 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 20 |
| Threads | 16 | 28 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 65 Watt |
EPYC 7203 has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
i7-14700F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, 150% more physical cores and 75% more threads, and 84.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 7203 and Core i7-14700F. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7203 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-14700F is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7203 and Core i7-14700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
