Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX vs EPYC 4565P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 4565P
2025
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
39.73
+59%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
2020
16 cores / 32 threads, 280 Watt
24.98

EPYC 4565P outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking80246
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation70.8914.54
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency22.548.61
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCTSMC
Architecture codenameGrado (2025)Castle Peak (2020)
Release date13 May 2025 (recently)14 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$589$1,149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4565P has 388% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 4565P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3232
Base clock speed4.3 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed5.7 GHz4.3 GHz
Multiplierno data39
L1 cache80 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)64 MB
Chip lithography4 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size2x 70.6 mm22x 74 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors16,630 million7,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 4565P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5WRX8
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4565P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4565P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4565P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon GraphicsN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4565P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes24128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 4565P 39.73
+59%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 24.98

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 4565P 63879
+59.1%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 40160

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.73 24.98
Recency 13 May 2025 14 July 2020
Chip lithography 4 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 280 Watt

EPYC 4565P has a 59% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 64.7% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 4565P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 4565P
EPYC 4565P
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4565P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 25 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 4565P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.