PRO A10-8770E vs EPYC 4565P
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 4565P outperforms PRO A10-8770E by a whopping 2025% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 80 | 2133 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 70.89 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 22.54 | 5.15 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Grado (2025) | Carrizo (2015−2018) |
| Release date | 13 May 2025 (recently) | October 2016 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $589 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 4565P and PRO A10-8770E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2048 KB |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 2x 70.6 mm2 | 250 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | 16,630 million | 3,100 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 4565P and PRO A10-8770E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM5 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4565P and PRO A10-8770E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| FRTC | - | + |
| FreeSync | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4565P and PRO A10-8770E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4565P and PRO A10-8770E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4-2400 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| iGPU core count | no data | 6 |
| Switchable graphics | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 4565P and PRO A10-8770E integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | - | n/a |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by EPYC 4565P and PRO A10-8770E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4565P and PRO A10-8770E.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 39.73 | 1.87 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 4 |
| Threads | 32 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 35 Watt |
EPYC 4565P has a 2024.6% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.
PRO A10-8770E, on the other hand, has 385.7% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 4565P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD PRO A10-8770E in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 4565P is a server/workstation processor while PRO A10-8770E is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
