Atom x7213E vs EPYC 4565P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 80 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 70.89 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 22.54 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Grado (2025) | Gracemont (2023) |
| Release date | 13 May 2025 (recently) | 3 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $589 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 4565P and Atom x7213E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 32 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.7 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 2x 70.6 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 16,630 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 4565P and Atom x7213E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM5 | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4565P and Atom x7213E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 4565P and Atom x7213E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4565P and Atom x7213E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4565P and Atom x7213E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 16EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4565P and Atom x7213E.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 13 May 2025 | 3 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
| Threads | 32 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 6 Watt |
EPYC 4565P has an age advantage of 2 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
Atom x7213E, on the other hand, has 2733.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 4565P and Intel Atom x7213E. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 4565P is a server/workstation processor while Atom x7213E is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
