Xeon 6315P vs EPYC 4484PX
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 4484PX outperforms Xeon 6315P by a whopping 352% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 179 | 1165 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 50.59 | 21.15 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 10.13 | 4.89 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Raphael (2023−2025) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 21 May 2024 (1 year ago) | 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $213 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
EPYC 4484PX has 139% better value for money than Xeon 6315P.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 4484PX and Xeon 6315P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 4 |
| Threads | 24 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.6 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 16 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 2x 71 mm2 | 163 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 47 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 17,840 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 4484PX and Xeon 6315P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM5 | FCLGA1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4484PX and Xeon 6315P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 4484PX and Xeon 6315P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4484PX and Xeon 6315P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4484PX and Xeon 6315P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4484PX and Xeon 6315P.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 28 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 28.91 | 6.39 |
| Recency | 21 May 2024 | 24 February 2025 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 4 |
| Threads | 24 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 55 Watt |
EPYC 4484PX has a 352.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.
Xeon 6315P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 118.2% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 4484PX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon 6315P in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
