Athlon 3000G (FB) vs EPYC 4465P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 169 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 75.43 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 18.68 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Grado (2025) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago) | 20 November 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $49 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 4465P and Athlon 3000G (FB) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 24 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 2x 70.6 mm2 | 210 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 16,630 million | 4,950 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 4465P and Athlon 3000G (FB) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM5 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4465P and Athlon 3000G (FB). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4465P and Athlon 3000G (FB) are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4465P and Athlon 3000G (FB). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | AMD Radeon Vega 3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4465P and Athlon 3000G (FB).
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 1.80 | 2.71 |
| Recency | 13 May 2025 | 20 November 2019 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 2 |
| Threads | 24 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
EPYC 4465P has an age advantage of 5 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon 3000G (FB), on the other hand, has 50.6% faster integrated GPU, and 85.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 4465P and AMD Athlon 3000G (FB). We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 4465P is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 3000G (FB) is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
