Ryzen AI Max+ 392 vs EPYC 4464P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 227 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 69.84 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 10.88 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Raphael (2023−2025) | Strix Halo (2025−2026) |
| Release date | 21 May 2024 (1 year ago) | 6 January 2026 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 4464P and Ryzen AI Max+ 392 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.4 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 2x 71 mm2 | 2x 70.6 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 61 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 13,140 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 4464P and Ryzen AI Max+ 392 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM5 | FP11 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4464P and Ryzen AI Max+ 392. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4464P and Ryzen AI Max+ 392 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4464P and Ryzen AI Max+ 392. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | AMD Radeon 8060S |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4464P and Ryzen AI Max+ 392.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 28 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 1.83 | 43.29 |
| Recency | 21 May 2024 | 6 January 2026 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 55 Watt |
Ryzen AI Max+ 392 has 2265.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 90.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 4464P and AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 4464P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
