Ryzen Threadripper 9980X vs EPYC 4364P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 4364P
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
21.65
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
2025
64 cores / 128 threads, 350 Watt
91.73
+324%

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X outperforms EPYC 4364P by a whopping 324% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3026
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation44.91no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency7.9710.13
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCTSMC
Architecture codenameRaphael (2023−2025)Shimada Peak (2025)
Release date21 May 2024 (1 year ago)July 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$399no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 4364P and Ryzen Threadripper 9980X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads16128
Base clock speed4.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm4 nm
Die size71 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)61 °Cno data
Number of transistors6,570 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 4364P and Ryzen Threadripper 9980X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5sTR5
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4364P and Ryzen Threadripper 9980X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4364P and Ryzen Threadripper 9980X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4364P and Ryzen Threadripper 9980X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon GraphicsN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4364P and Ryzen Threadripper 9980X.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes2880

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 4364P 21.65
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X 91.73
+324%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 4364P 34811
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X 147481
+324%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.65 91.73
Physical cores 8 64
Threads 16 128
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 350 Watt

EPYC 4364P has 233.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X, on the other hand, has a 323.7% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD EPYC 4364P in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 4364P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 9980X is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 4364P
EPYC 4364P
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4364P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 8 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 9980X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 4364P and Ryzen Threadripper 9980X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.