Ryzen 5 PRO 230 vs EPYC 4364P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 265 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 44.61 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) |
| Power efficiency | 19.80 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raphael (2023−2025) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 21 May 2024 (less than a year ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 4364P and Ryzen 5 PRO 230 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.4 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 71 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 61 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 6,570 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 4364P and Ryzen 5 PRO 230 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM5 | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4364P and Ryzen 5 PRO 230. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4364P and Ryzen 5 PRO 230 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4364P and Ryzen 5 PRO 230. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4364P and Ryzen 5 PRO 230.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 28 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 1.81 | 13.42 |
| Recency | 21 May 2024 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 6 |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 28 Watt |
EPYC 4364P has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.
Ryzen 5 PRO 230, on the other hand, has 641.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 months, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 4364P and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 230. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 4364P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 230 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
