Xeon Phi 7210 vs EPYC 4345P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 4345P
2025
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
23.43
+416%
Xeon Phi 7210
2016
64 cores / 256 threads, 215 Watt
4.54

EPYC 4345P outperforms Xeon Phi 7210 by a whopping 416% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2621428
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation60.51no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency34.772.04
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameGrado (2025)Knights Landing (2016)
Release date13 May 2025 (recently)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 4345P and Xeon Phi 7210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads16256
Base clock speed3.8 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz1.5 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)32 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)0 KB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm14 nm
Die size70.6 mm2no data
Number of transistors8,315 million8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 4345P and Xeon Phi 7210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM53647
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt215 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4345P and Xeon Phi 7210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 4345P and Xeon Phi 7210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4345P and Xeon Phi 7210 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4345P and Xeon Phi 7210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Graphicsno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4345P and Xeon Phi 7210.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes24no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 4345P 23.43
+416%
Xeon Phi 7210 4.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 4345P 37671
+416%
Xeon Phi 7210 7306

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.43 4.54
Recency 13 May 2025 20 June 2016
Physical cores 8 64
Threads 16 256
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 215 Watt

EPYC 4345P has a 416.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 230.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Phi 7210, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

The AMD EPYC 4345P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Phi 7210 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 4345P
EPYC 4345P
Intel Xeon Phi 7210
Xeon Phi 7210

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4345P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 8 votes

Rate Xeon Phi 7210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 4345P and Xeon Phi 7210, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.