Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs EPYC 4345P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 4345P
2025
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
23.43
+70.8%
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 140 Watt
13.72

EPYC 4345P outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920 by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking262611
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation60.51no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency34.779.45
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameGrado (2025)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date13 May 2025 (recently)29 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 4345P and Ryzen Threadripper 1920 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1624
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)32 MB
Chip lithography4 nm14 nm
Die size70.6 mm2213 mm2
Number of transistors8,315 million9,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 4345P and Ryzen Threadripper 1920 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt140 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4345P and Ryzen Threadripper 1920. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4345P and Ryzen Threadripper 1920 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4345P and Ryzen Threadripper 1920. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4 Quad-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Graphicsno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4345P and Ryzen Threadripper 1920.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes24no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 4345P 23.43
+70.8%
Ryzen Threadripper 1920 13.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 4345P 37671
+70.7%
Ryzen Threadripper 1920 22066

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.43 13.72
Recency 13 May 2025 29 July 2017
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 16 24
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 140 Watt

EPYC 4345P has a 70.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 115.4% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The AMD EPYC 4345P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 4345P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 4345P
EPYC 4345P
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4345P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 27 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 4345P and Ryzen Threadripper 1920, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.