Celeron 6205 vs EPYC 4345P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking262not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation60.51no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Tiger Lake
Power efficiency34.77no data
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameGrado (2025)Tiger Lake U (2020)
Release date13 May 2025 (recently)1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 4345P and Celeron 6205 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed3.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz2/2 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)160 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2.5 MB
L3 cache32 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography4 nm10 nm
Die size70.6 mm2no data
Number of transistors8,315 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 4345P and Celeron 6205 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM5BGA1499
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4345P and Celeron 6205. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4345P and Celeron 6205 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4345P and Celeron 6205. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4345P and Celeron 6205.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes24no data

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 1.92 4.43
Recency 13 May 2025 1 September 2020
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 4 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

EPYC 4345P has an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 6205, on the other hand, has 130.7% faster integrated GPU, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 4345P and Intel Celeron 6205. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 4345P is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 6205 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 4345P
EPYC 4345P
Intel Celeron 6205
Celeron 6205

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4345P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Celeron 6205 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 4345P and Celeron 6205, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.