Celeron 6205 vs EPYC 4345P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 270 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 60.61 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Tiger Lake |
| Power efficiency | 13.94 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Grado (2025) | Tiger Lake U (2020) |
| Release date | 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago) | 1 September 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 4345P and Celeron 6205 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5.5 GHz | 2/2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 70.6 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 8,315 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 4345P and Celeron 6205 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM5 | BGA1499 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4345P and Celeron 6205. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4345P and Celeron 6205 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4345P and Celeron 6205. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4345P and Celeron 6205.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 1.80 | 4.16 |
| Recency | 13 May 2025 | 1 September 2020 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
EPYC 4345P has an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron 6205, on the other hand, has 131.1% faster integrated GPU, and 333.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 4345P and Intel Celeron 6205. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 4345P is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 6205 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
