A8-7680 vs EPYC 4345P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 4345P
2025
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
23.43
+951%
A8-7680
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
2.23

EPYC 4345P outperforms A8-7680 by a whopping 951% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2691997
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation60.6115.78
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD A8
Power efficiency13.941.92
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameGrado (2025)Excavator (2017−2018)
Release date13 May 2025 (less than a year ago)26 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329$56

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4345P has 284% better value for money than A8-7680.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 4345P and A8-7680 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplierno data38
L1 cache80 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography4 nm28 nm
Die size70.6 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors8,315 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 4345P and A8-7680 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4345P and A8-7680. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4345P and A8-7680 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4345P and A8-7680. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data14.936 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon GraphicsRadeon R7 Series

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4345P and A8-7680.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes24no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 4345P 23.43
+951%
A8-7680 2.23

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 4345P 37671
+953%
A8-7680 3578

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.43 2.23
Recency 13 May 2025 26 October 2018
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

EPYC 4345P has a 950.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

A8-7680, on the other hand, has 44.4% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 4345P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A8-7680 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 4345P is a server/workstation processor while A8-7680 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 4345P
EPYC 4345P
AMD A8-7680
A8-7680

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4345P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 532 votes

Rate A8-7680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 4345P and A8-7680, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.