Xeon E5-2670 v4 vs EPYC 4245P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 349 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 64.75 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon E5 |
| Power efficiency | 28.85 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Grado (2025) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| Release date | 13 May 2025 (recently) | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $239 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 4245P and Xeon E5-2670 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 28 |
| Base clock speed | 3.9 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5.4 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | QPI |
| Bus rate | no data | 2 × 9.6 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 31 |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 3.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 35 MB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 70.6 mm2 | 306.18 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 8,315 million | 4700 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 4245P and Xeon E5-2670 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | AM5 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4245P and Xeon E5-2670 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 4245P and Xeon E5-2670 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4245P and Xeon E5-2670 v4 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4245P and Xeon E5-2670 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1,536 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4245P and Xeon E5-2670 v4.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | 40 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 13 May 2025 | 20 June 2016 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 14 |
| Threads | 12 | 28 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 120 Watt |
EPYC 4245P has an age advantage of 8 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 84.6% lower power consumption.
Xeon E5-2670 v4, on the other hand, has 133.3% more physical cores and 133.3% more threads.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 4245P and Intel Xeon E5-2670 v4. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
