Processor U300 vs EPYC 4245P
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 4245P outperforms Processor U300 by a whopping 247% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 349 | 1275 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 64.75 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Raptor Lake-U |
| Power efficiency | 28.85 | 36.08 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Grado (2025) | Raptor Lake-U (2023) |
| Release date | 13 May 2025 (recently) | 4 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $239 | $193 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 4245P and Processor U300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 5 (Penta-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 55 MHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 70.6 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 8,315 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 4245P and Processor U300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM5 | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4245P and Processor U300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 4245P and Processor U300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4245P and Processor U300 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4245P and Processor U300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ( - 1100 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4245P and Processor U300.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 19.44 | 5.61 |
| Integrated graphics card | 1.92 | 4.43 |
| Recency | 13 May 2025 | 4 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 5 |
| Threads | 12 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
EPYC 4245P has a 246.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 20% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
Processor U300, on the other hand, has 130.7% faster integrated GPU, and 333.3% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 4245P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Processor U300 in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 4245P is a server/workstation processor while Processor U300 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
