Celeron J3455 vs EPYC 4245P
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 4245P outperforms Celeron J3455 by a whopping 1289% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 349 | 2373 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 64.75 | 0.23 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 28.85 | 13.50 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Grado (2025) | Apollo Lake (2014−2016) |
| Release date | 13 May 2025 (recently) | 30 August 2016 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $239 | $107 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
EPYC 4245P has 28052% better value for money than Celeron J3455.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 4245P and Celeron J3455 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.4 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 15 |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 70.6 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 8,315 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 4245P and Celeron J3455 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM5 | FCBGA1296 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4245P and Celeron J3455. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Smart Response | no data | - |
| GPIO | no data | + |
| Smart Connect | no data | - |
| HD Audio | no data | + |
| RST | no data | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 4245P and Celeron J3455 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Boot | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| OS Guard | no data | - |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4245P and Celeron J3455 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| VT-i | no data | - |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4245P and Celeron J3455. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 500 |
| Max video memory | no data | 8 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 750 MHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 12 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 4245P and Celeron J3455 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| MIPI-DSI | no data | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by EPYC 4245P and Celeron J3455 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | + |
| OpenGL | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4245P and Celeron J3455.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | 6 |
| USB revision | no data | 2.0/3.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 8 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | - |
| UART | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 19.44 | 1.40 |
| Integrated graphics card | 1.92 | 0.75 |
| Recency | 13 May 2025 | 30 August 2016 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 10 Watt |
EPYC 4245P has a 1288.6% higher aggregate performance score, 156% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron J3455, on the other hand, has 550% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 4245P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron J3455 in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 4245P is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J3455 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
