Xeon E5-1686 V3 vs E2-9000
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3091 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Bristol Ridge | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| Release date | 1 June 2016 (9 years ago) | 8 September 2014 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
E2-9000 and Xeon E5-1686 V3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 30 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 124.5 mm2 | 356 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1200 Million | 2,600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on E2-9000 and Xeon E5-1686 V3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA | 2011-3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 MB | 135 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9000 and Xeon E5-1686 V3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Virtualization, | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
E2-9000 and Xeon E5-1686 V3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9000 and Xeon E5-1686 V3 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9000 and Xeon E5-1686 V3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-2133 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-9000 and Xeon E5-1686 V3.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 40 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 June 2016 | 8 September 2014 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 12 |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 Watt | 135 Watt |
E2-9000 has an age advantage of 1 year, and 13400% lower power consumption.
Xeon E5-1686 V3, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD E2-9000 and Intel Xeon E5-1686 V3. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that E2-9000 is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-1686 V3 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
