Xeon E-2436 vs E2-9000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-9000
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.64
Xeon E-2436
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
14.72
+2200%

Xeon E-2436 outperforms E2-9000 by a whopping 2200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-9000 and Xeon E-2436 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2669453
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesBristol Ridgeno data
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Raptor Lake-S
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Current price$78 no data

Detailed specifications

E2-9000 and Xeon E-2436 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz5 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size124.5 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on E2-9000 and Xeon E-2436 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAFCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9000 and Xeon E-2436. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSingle-Channel DDR4-1866, Virtualization,Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

E2-9000 and Xeon E-2436 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9000 and Xeon E-2436 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9000 and Xeon E-2436. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-9000 and Xeon E-2436.

PCIe versionno data5
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-9000 0.64
Xeon E-2436 14.72
+2200%

Xeon E-2436 outperforms E2-9000 by 2200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

E2-9000 983
Xeon E-2436 22775
+2217%

Xeon E-2436 outperforms E2-9000 by 2217% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 14.72
Recency 1 June 2016 14 December 2023
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt

The Xeon E-2436 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-9000 in performance tests.

Be aware that E2-9000 is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2436 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-9000 and Xeon E-2436, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-9000
E2-9000
Intel Xeon E-2436
Xeon E-2436

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 304 votes

Rate E2-9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon E-2436 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-9000 or Xeon E-2436, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.