Xeon E-2336 vs E2-9000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-9000
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 1 Watt
0.54
Xeon E-2336
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
9.15
+1594%

Xeon E-2336 outperforms E2-9000 by a whopping 1594% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3093965
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesBristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiencyno data15.08
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Rocket Lake-E (2021)
Release date1 June 2016 (9 years ago)8 September 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-9000 and Xeon E-2336 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size124.5 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on E2-9000 and Xeon E-2336 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAFCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)1 MB65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9000 and Xeon E-2336. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

E2-9000 and Xeon E-2336 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9000 and Xeon E-2336 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9000 and Xeon E-2336. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-9000 and Xeon E-2336.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data44

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

E2-9000 0.54
Xeon E-2336 9.15
+1594%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

E2-9000 952
Samples: 82
Xeon E-2336 16136
+1595%
Samples: 30

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.54 9.15
Recency 1 June 2016 8 September 2021
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 1 Watt 65 Watt

E2-9000 has 6400% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2336, on the other hand, has a 1594.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon E-2336 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD E2-9000 in performance tests.

Be aware that E2-9000 is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2336 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-9000
E2-9000
Intel Xeon E-2336
Xeon E-2336

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 335 votes

Rate E2-9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 48 votes

Rate Xeon E-2336 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors E2-9000 and Xeon E-2336, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.