Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 vs E2-9000
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 outperforms E2-9000 by a whopping 5156% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2919 | 156 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Bristol Ridge | no data |
| Power efficiency | 5.65 | 53.97 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| Release date | 1 June 2016 (8 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
E2-9000 and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 124.5 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1200 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on E2-9000 and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA | FP11 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9000 and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Virtualization, | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9000 and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9000 and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz) | AMD Radeon 8060S |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-9000 and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.59 | 31.01 |
| Integrated graphics card | 0.94 | 37.66 |
| Recency | 1 June 2016 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 16 |
| Threads | 2 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 55 Watt |
E2-9000 has 450% lower power consumption.
Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395, on the other hand, has a 5155.9% higher aggregate performance score, 3906.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD E2-9000 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
