EPYC 7763 vs E2-9000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-9000
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.64
EPYC 7763
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
54.72
+8450%

EPYC 7763 outperforms E2-9000 by a whopping 8450% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-9000 and EPYC 7763 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking266921
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data34.37
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesBristol RidgeAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Milan (2021)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,890
Current price$78 $1641 (0.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E2-9000 and EPYC 7763 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.45 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm+
Die size124.5 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on E2-9000 and EPYC 7763 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketBGASP3
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9000 and EPYC 7763. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSingle-Channel DDR4-1866, Virtualization,no data
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9000 and EPYC 7763 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9000 and EPYC 7763. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-9000 and EPYC 7763.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-9000 0.64
EPYC 7763 54.72
+8450%

EPYC 7763 outperforms E2-9000 by 8450% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

E2-9000 983
EPYC 7763 84634
+8510%

EPYC 7763 outperforms E2-9000 by 8510% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 54.72
Recency 1 June 2016 15 March 2021
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 280 Watt

The EPYC 7763 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-9000 in performance tests.

Be aware that E2-9000 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7763 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-9000 and EPYC 7763, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-9000
E2-9000
AMD EPYC 7763
EPYC 7763

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 303 votes

Rate E2-9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1196 votes

Rate EPYC 7763 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-9000 or EPYC 7763, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.