Athlon 64 X2 5200+ vs E2-9000
Aggregate performance score
E2-9000 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5200+ by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing E2-9000 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2868 | 2918 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Bristol Ridge | no data |
| Power efficiency | 5.62 | 0.57 |
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| Release date | 1 June 2016 (8 years ago) | September 2006 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
E2-9000 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 124.5 mm2 | 220 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1200 Million | 154 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on E2-9000 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 89 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9000 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Virtualization, | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9000 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9000 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz) | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.59 | 0.53 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 89 Watt |
E2-9000 has a 11.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 790% lower power consumption.
The E2-9000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ in performance tests.
Be aware that E2-9000 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 5200+ is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
