Ryzen 3 4300U vs E2-7110

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-7110
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.48
Ryzen 3 4300U
2020
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
4.81
+225%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms E2-7110 by a whopping 225% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-7110 and Ryzen 3 4300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20771191
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Renoir-U (Zen 2)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price$385 $520

Detailed specifications

E2-7110 and Ryzen 3 4300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Number of transistors930 Million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on E2-7110 and Ryzen 3 4300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4FP6
Power consumption (TDP)12-15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-7110 and Ryzen 3 4300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4+
AVX++
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-7110 and Ryzen 3 4300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V1+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-7110 and Ryzen 3 4300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R2 GraphicsAMD Radeon RX Vega 5
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-7110 and Ryzen 3 4300U integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-7110 and Ryzen 3 4300U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-7110 and Ryzen 3 4300U.

PCIe version2.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-7110 1.48
Ryzen 3 4300U 4.81
+225%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms E2-7110 by 225% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

E2-7110 2282
Ryzen 3 4300U 7445
+226%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms E2-7110 by 226% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

E2-7110 184
Ryzen 3 4300U 1248
+578%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms E2-7110 by 578% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

E2-7110 533
Ryzen 3 4300U 3369
+532%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms E2-7110 by 532% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

E2-7110 2407
Ryzen 3 4300U 6068
+152%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms E2-7110 by 152% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

E2-7110 140
Ryzen 3 4300U 563
+302%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms E2-7110 by 302% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

E2-7110 37
Ryzen 3 4300U 164
+343%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms E2-7110 by 343% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E2-7110 1.1
Ryzen 3 4300U 3.2
+191%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms E2-7110 by 191% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E2-7110 1090
Ryzen 3 4300U 2397
+120%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms E2-7110 by 120% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E2-7110 11
Ryzen 3 4300U 35
+224%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms E2-7110 by 224% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E2-7110 46
Ryzen 3 4300U 172
+271%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms E2-7110 by 271% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

E2-7110 3253
Ryzen 3 4300U 13134
+304%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms E2-7110 by 304% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

E2-7110 1012
Ryzen 3 4300U 4042
+299%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms E2-7110 by 299% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

E2-7110 3601
Ryzen 3 4300U 11281
+213%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms E2-7110 by 213% in Geekbench 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.48 4.81
Recency 7 May 2015 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 15 Watt

The Ryzen 3 4300U is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-7110 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-7110 and Ryzen 3 4300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-7110
E2-7110
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
Ryzen 3 4300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 208 votes

Rate E2-7110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 911 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 4300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-7110 or Ryzen 3 4300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.