Sempron 2650 vs E2-3800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-3800
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.64
+113%

E2-3800 outperforms Sempron 2650 by a whopping 113% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29993374
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency4.571.29
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date23 May 2013 (12 years ago)9 April 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-3800 and Sempron 2650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz1.45 GHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache2048 KB1024 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size107 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on E2-3800 and Sempron 2650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3AM1
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3800 and Sempron 2650. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4FMA4
AVX++
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
VirusProtect++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3800 and Sempron 2650 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3800 and Sempron 2650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR3-1333
Max memory channels11

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8280AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
จำนวนพาธไลน์128128
Enduro++
Switchable graphics++
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-3800 and Sempron 2650 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-3800 and Sempron 2650 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3800 and Sempron 2650.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes44

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

E2-3800 0.64
+113%
Sempron 2650 0.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

E2-3800 1136
+118%
Samples: 125
Sempron 2650 522
Samples: 52

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E2-3800 136
Sempron 2650 146
+7.4%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E2-3800 389
+62.8%
Sempron 2650 239

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 0.30
Recency 23 May 2013 9 April 2014
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

E2-3800 has a 113.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

Sempron 2650, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months.

The AMD E2-3800 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Sempron 2650 in performance tests.

Be aware that E2-3800 is a notebook processor while Sempron 2650 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3800
E2-3800
AMD Sempron 2650
Sempron 2650

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 104 votes

Rate E2-3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 19 votes

Rate Sempron 2650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors E2-3800 and Sempron 2650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.