EPYC 9655 vs E2-3800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E2-3800 and EPYC 9655 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2689not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency4.58no data
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Turin (2024)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,852

Detailed specifications

E2-3800 and EPYC 9655 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)96
Threads4192
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm4 nm
Die size107 mm212x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data99,780 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on E2-3800 and EPYC 9655 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFT3SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3800 and EPYC 9655. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3800 and EPYC 9655 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3800 and EPYC 9655. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR5
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8280N/A
Number of pipelines128no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-3800 and EPYC 9655 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-3800 and EPYC 9655 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3800 and EPYC 9655.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes4128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 96
Threads 4 192
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 400 Watt

E2-3800 has 2566.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9655, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between E2-3800 and EPYC 9655. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E2-3800 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9655 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3800 and EPYC 9655, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3800
E2-3800
AMD EPYC 9655
EPYC 9655

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 104 votes

Rate E2-3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 16 votes

Rate EPYC 9655 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3800 or EPYC 9655, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.