Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs E2-3800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-3800
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.65
+97%

E2-3800 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29933331
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series2x AMD Athlon 64
Power efficiency4.65no data
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Tyler (2007−2009)
Release date23 May 2013 (12 years ago)1 November 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-3800 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rateno data1600 MHz
L1 cache128 KB0 MB
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-3800 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT3Socket S1
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt1 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3800 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX86x Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP), MMX, PowerNow, SSE3,-64, Enhanced 3DNow
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow++
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3800 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3800 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8280no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์128no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-3800 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-3800 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3800 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

E2-3800 0.65
+97%
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 0.33

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

E2-3800 1138
+97.2%
Samples: 124
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 577
Samples: 31

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.65 0.33
Recency 23 May 2013 1 November 2009
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 1 Watt

E2-3800 has a 97% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42, on the other hand, has 1400% lower power consumption.

The AMD E2-3800 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3800
E2-3800
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 104 votes

Rate E2-3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 8 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors E2-3800 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.