Celeron 927UE vs E2-3200
Primary details
Comparing E2-3200 and Celeron 927UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2780 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 0.88 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 7 September 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 January 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $107 |
Detailed specifications
E2-3200 and Celeron 927UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 228 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on E2-3200 and Celeron 927UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FM1 | BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3200 and Celeron 927UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3200 and Celeron 927UE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3200 and Celeron 927UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Radeon HD 6370D | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 September 2011 | 1 January 2013 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 17 Watt |
E2-3200 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Celeron 927UE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 282.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between E2-3200 and Celeron 927UE. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that E2-3200 is a desktop processor while Celeron 927UE is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3200 and Celeron 927UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
