Xeon E5-2430L vs E2-3000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-3000M
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.38
Xeon E5-2430L
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 60 Watt
3.00
+689%

Xeon E5-2430L outperforms E2-3000M by a whopping 689% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32771843
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency0.462.13
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
Release date20 December 2011 (14 years ago)14 May 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-3000M and Xeon E5-2430L basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rateno data7.2 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB15360 KB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size228 mm2294 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million1,270 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-3000M and Xeon E5-2430L compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFS1FCLGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt60 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3000M and Xeon E5-2430L. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.1/2, 3DNow, Radeon HD 6380GIntel® AVX
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+

Security technologies

E2-3000M and Xeon E5-2430L technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3000M and Xeon E5-2430L are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3000M and Xeon E5-2430L. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data384 GB
Max memory channelsno data3
Maximum memory bandwidthno data32 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6380Gno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3000M and Xeon E5-2430L.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

E2-3000M 0.38
Xeon E5-2430L 3.00
+689%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

E2-3000M 668
Samples: 116
Xeon E5-2430L 5300
+693%
Samples: 7

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.38 3.00
Recency 20 December 2011 14 May 2012
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 60 Watt

E2-3000M has 71.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-2430L, on the other hand, has a 689.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

The Intel Xeon E5-2430L is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD E2-3000M in performance tests.

Be aware that E2-3000M is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-2430L is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3000M
E2-3000M
Intel Xeon E5-2430L
Xeon E5-2430L

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 55 votes

Rate E2-3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 5 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2430L on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors E2-3000M and Xeon E5-2430L, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.