Turion II Ultra M620 vs E2-3000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-3000M
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.42
Turion II Ultra M620
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.51
+21.4%

Turion II Ultra M620 outperforms E2-3000M by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-3000M and Turion II Ultra M620 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29932884
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD Turion II Ultra
Power efficiency1.141.39
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Caspian (2009)
Release date20 December 2011 (13 years ago)10 September 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-3000M and Turion II Ultra M620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rateno data3600 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size228 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-3000M and Turion II Ultra M620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3000M and Turion II Ultra M620. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.1/2, 3DNow, Radeon HD 6380GMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
PowerNow-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3000M and Turion II Ultra M620 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3000M and Turion II Ultra M620. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6380Gno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-3000M 0.42
Turion II Ultra M620 0.51
+21.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-3000M 668
Turion II Ultra M620 814
+21.9%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E2-3000M 231
Turion II Ultra M620 297
+28.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E2-3000M 426
Turion II Ultra M620 550
+29.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 0.51
Recency 20 December 2011 10 September 2009
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm

E2-3000M has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Turion II Ultra M620, on the other hand, has a 21.4% higher aggregate performance score.

The Turion II Ultra M620 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-3000M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3000M and Turion II Ultra M620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3000M
E2-3000M
AMD Turion II Ultra M620
Turion II Ultra M620

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 54 votes

Rate E2-3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 29 votes

Rate Turion II Ultra M620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3000M or Turion II Ultra M620, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.