i7-9700KF vs E2-3000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E2-3000M and Core i7-9700KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated832
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.27
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel Core i7
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date20 December 2011 (12 years ago)8 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$374

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E2-3000M and Core i7-9700KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.8 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size228 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on E2-3000M and Core i7-9700KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFS1FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3000M and Core i7-9700KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.1/2, 3DNow, Radeon HD 6380GIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

E2-3000M and Core i7-9700KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3000M and Core i7-9700KF are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3000M and Core i7-9700KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6380Gno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3000M and Core i7-9700KF.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-3000M 668
i7-9700KF 14258
+2034%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E2-3000M 231
i7-9700KF 1700
+636%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E2-3000M 426
i7-9700KF 7265
+1605%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 December 2011 8 January 2019
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

E2-3000M has 171.4% lower power consumption.

i7-9700KF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between E2-3000M and Core i7-9700KF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E2-3000M is a notebook processor while Core i7-9700KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3000M and Core i7-9700KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3000M
E2-3000M
Intel Core i7-9700KF
Core i7-9700KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 53 votes

Rate E2-3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 417 votes

Rate Core i7-9700KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3000M or Core i7-9700KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.