Xeon Platinum 8280 vs E2-3000

VS

Primary details

Comparing E2-3000 and Xeon Platinum 8280 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated264
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.66
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel Xeon Platinum
Power efficiencyno data9.53
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)11 December 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$10,009

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E2-3000 and Xeon Platinum 8280 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads256
Base clock speedno data2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.65 GHz4 GHz
Multiplierno data27
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB38.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data84 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on E2-3000 and Xeon Platinum 8280 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration18 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFT3FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3000 and Xeon Platinum 8280. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

E2-3000 and Xeon Platinum 8280 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3000 and Xeon Platinum 8280 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3000 and Xeon Platinum 8280. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channels16
Maximum memory bandwidthno data140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8280N/A
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-3000 and Xeon Platinum 8280 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-3000 and Xeon Platinum 8280 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3000 and Xeon Platinum 8280.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-3000 726
Xeon Platinum 8280 32781
+4415%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 11 December 2018
Physical cores 2 28
Threads 2 56
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 205 Watt

E2-3000 has 1266.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8280, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between E2-3000 and Xeon Platinum 8280. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E2-3000 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8280 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3000 and Xeon Platinum 8280, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3000
E2-3000
Intel Xeon Platinum 8280
Xeon Platinum 8280

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 26 votes

Rate E2-3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 124 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3000 or Xeon Platinum 8280, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.