Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G vs E2-3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-3000
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.42
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
11.54
+2648%

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G outperforms E2-3000 by a whopping 2648% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3253807
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency1.187.49
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Renoir (2020−2023)
Release date23 May 2013 (12 years ago)21 July 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-3000 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.65 GHz4.4 GHz
Multiplierno data36
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm
Die size246 mm2156 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °C95 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on E2-3000 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3AM4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3000 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3000 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3000 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8280AMD Radeon Vega 8
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-3000 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-3000 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3000 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

E2-3000 0.42
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G 11.54
+2648%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

E2-3000 743
Samples: 18
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G 20218
+2621%
Samples: 596

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 11.54
Integrated graphics card 0.62 4.15
Recency 23 May 2013 21 July 2020
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

E2-3000 has 333% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G, on the other hand, has a 2648% higher aggregate performance score, 569% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD E2-3000 in performance tests.

Be aware that E2-3000 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 27 votes

Rate E2-3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 464 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors E2-3000 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.