Pentium Dual-Core E2200 vs E2-3000

Aggregate performance score

E2-3000
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.46
Pentium Dual-Core E2200
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.47
+2.2%

Pentium Dual-Core E2200 outperforms E2-3000 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-3000 and Pentium Dual-Core E2200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29262913
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency2.900.68
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Allendale (2006−2009)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)December 2007 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-3000 and Pentium Dual-Core E2200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.65 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB1 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die size246 mm277 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-3000 and Pentium Dual-Core E2200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3775
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3000 and Pentium Dual-Core E2200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3000 and Pentium Dual-Core E2200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3000 and Pentium Dual-Core E2200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8280no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-3000 and Pentium Dual-Core E2200 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-3000 and Pentium Dual-Core E2200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3000 and Pentium Dual-Core E2200.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-3000 0.46
Pentium Dual-Core E2200 0.47
+2.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-3000 726
Pentium Dual-Core E2200 747
+2.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.46 0.47
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

E2-3000 has a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

Pentium Dual-Core E2200, on the other hand, has a 2.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between E2-3000 and Pentium Dual-Core E2200.

Be aware that E2-3000 is a notebook processor while Pentium Dual-Core E2200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3000 and Pentium Dual-Core E2200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3000
E2-3000
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2200
Pentium Dual-Core E2200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 26 votes

Rate E2-3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 230 votes

Rate Pentium Dual-Core E2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3000 or Pentium Dual-Core E2200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.