A4-5050 vs E2-2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-2000
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.31
A4-5050
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.84
+171%

A4-5050 outperforms E2-2000 by a whopping 171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-2000 and A4-5050 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31062592
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD A-Series
Power efficiency1.635.30
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date6 January 2013 (11 years ago)1 February 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-2000 and A4-5050 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Boost clock speed1.75 GHz1.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography40 nm32 nm
Die size75 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-2000 and A4-5050 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFT3
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-2000 and A4-5050. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-2000 and A4-5050 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-2000 and A4-5050. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7340AMD Radeon HD 8330 (? - 500 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-2000 0.31
A4-5050 0.84
+171%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-2000 496
A4-5050 1328
+168%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 0.84
Integrated graphics card 0.40 0.69
Recency 6 January 2013 1 February 2014
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 40 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 15 Watt

A4-5050 has a 171% higher aggregate performance score, 72.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

The A4-5050 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-2000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-2000 and A4-5050, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-2000
E2-2000
AMD A4-5050
A4-5050

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 58 votes

Rate E2-2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 14 votes

Rate A4-5050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-2000 or A4-5050, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.