Celeron N5105 vs E1 Micro-6200T

VS

Aggregate performance score

E1 Micro-6200T
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 3 Watt
0.38
Celeron N5105
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
2.55
+571%

Celeron N5105 outperforms E1 Micro-6200T by a whopping 571% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E1 Micro-6200T and Celeron N5105 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30301748
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency9.1024.12
Architecture codenameMullins (2014)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E1 Micro-6200T and Celeron N5105 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz2.9 GHz
L2 cache1024 KB1.5 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on E1 Micro-6200T and Celeron N5105 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3bFCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)3.95 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1 Micro-6200T and Celeron N5105. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

E1 Micro-6200T and Celeron N5105 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1 Micro-6200T and Celeron N5105 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1 Micro-6200T and Celeron N5105. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channels12

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R2 GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data800 MHz
Execution Unitsno data24

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1 Micro-6200T and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by E1 Micro-6200T and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1 Micro-6200T and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 1212
OpenGLno data4.5
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1 Micro-6200T and Celeron N5105.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E1 Micro-6200T 0.38
Celeron N5105 2.55
+571%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1 Micro-6200T 600
Celeron N5105 4055
+576%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.38 2.55
Recency 29 April 2014 11 January 2021
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 10 Watt

E1 Micro-6200T has 233.3% lower power consumption.

Celeron N5105, on the other hand, has a 571.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron N5105 is our recommended choice as it beats the E1 Micro-6200T in performance tests.

Be aware that E1 Micro-6200T is a notebook processor while Celeron N5105 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1 Micro-6200T and Celeron N5105, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1 Micro-6200T
E1 Micro-6200T
Intel Celeron N5105
Celeron N5105

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 29 votes

Rate E1 Micro-6200T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 701 vote

Rate Celeron N5105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1 Micro-6200T or Celeron N5105, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.