Xeon w9-3575X vs E1-7010

VS

Primary details

Comparing E1-7010 and Xeon w9-3575X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated30
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data33.99
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiencyno data14.47
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,789

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E1-7010 and Xeon w9-3575X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)44
Threads288
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data97.5 MB
Chip lithography28 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
Number of transistors930 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on E1-7010 and Xeon w9-3575X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt340 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-7010 and Xeon w9-3575X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

E1-7010 and Xeon w9-3575X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-7010 and Xeon w9-3575X are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-7010 and Xeon w9-3575X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channels18
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 GraphicsN/A
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-7010 and Xeon w9-3575X integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-7010 and Xeon w9-3575X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-7010 and Xeon w9-3575X.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-7010 593
Xeon w9-3575X 82624
+13833%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 May 2015 24 August 2024
Physical cores 2 44
Threads 2 88
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 340 Watt

E1-7010 has 3300% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3575X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and 2100% more physical cores and 4300% more threads.

We couldn't decide between E1-7010 and Xeon w9-3575X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E1-7010 is a notebook processor while Xeon w9-3575X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-7010 and Xeon w9-3575X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-7010
E1-7010
Intel Xeon w9-3575X
Xeon w9-3575X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 228 votes

Rate E1-7010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w9-3575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-7010 or Xeon w9-3575X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.