Xeon Silver 4316 vs E1-7010

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E1-7010
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.35
Xeon Silver 4316
2021
20 cores / 40 threads, 150 Watt
18.60
+5214%

Xeon Silver 4316 outperforms E1-7010 by a whopping 5214% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3345397
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency1.485.23
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date7 May 2015 (10 years ago)6 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E1-7010 and Xeon Silver 4316 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads240
Base clock speedno data2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
Number of transistors930 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on E1-7010 and Xeon Silver 4316 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFP4FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-7010 and Xeon Silver 4316. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

E1-7010 and Xeon Silver 4316 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-7010 and Xeon Silver 4316 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-7010 and Xeon Silver 4316. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333DDR4-2667
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channels18
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 Graphicsno data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-7010 and Xeon Silver 4316 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-7010 and Xeon Silver 4316 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-7010 and Xeon Silver 4316.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

E1-7010 0.35
Xeon Silver 4316 18.60
+5214%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

E1-7010 613
Samples: 109
Xeon Silver 4316 32556
+5211%
Samples: 8

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 18.60
Recency 7 May 2015 6 April 2021
Physical cores 2 20
Threads 2 40
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 150 Watt

E1-7010 has 1400% lower power consumption.

Xeon Silver 4316, on the other hand, has a 5214.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon Silver 4316 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD E1-7010 in performance tests.

Be aware that E1-7010 is a notebook processor while Xeon Silver 4316 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-7010
E1-7010
Intel Xeon Silver 4316
Xeon Silver 4316

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 234 votes

Rate E1-7010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 27 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4316 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors E1-7010 and Xeon Silver 4316, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.